bioecon Member area
Bio-solution · NU04 · Fertilisers & plant nutrition

Recovered phosphorus (struvite and other recovered phosphates from biological wastewater and digester streams) instead of fertilizer made from cadmium-bearing phosphate rock

Replaces
A share of DAP/MAP/superphosphate made from mined phosphate rock; chemical P-removal with iron and aluminium salts at treatment plants (which locks the P away from agriculture)
→
Scope
Struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate) precipitated from digester liquors after enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR); other recovered phosphates (calcium phosphates, ash-derived products)
D1 works, adoption not proven · Partial (a growing but still small share of P demand; best as a low-cadmium slow-release component)

Suppliers 4

Ostara Nutrient Recovery TechnologiesCanadaactive
NuReSysBelgiumactive
Struvia (Veolia)Franceactive
EasyMiningSwedenactive

Route into Russia / EAEU AGROCHEM

Regulator
Ministry of Agriculture (Minselkhoz)
Typical time
about 1-2 years incl. registration trials
Legal basis
Federal Law 109-FZ; Minselkhoz Order No. 327 (13.05.2025): application, registration trials, expert assessment, entry in the State Register

Information, not legal advice — confirm the procedure for your product.

Proof 6 claims

Old process
Conventional mineral phosphorus fertilizer derived from phosphate rock.
→
New practice
Struvite recovery from wastewater (e.g., via PEARL, WASSTRIP, Airprex, NuReSys, Anphos processes) as a phosphorus fertilizer.
Displaced at scale?
no
Caveats
Struvite recovery is not a mainstream practice and has not displaced conventional mineral phosphorus fertilizer at scale; it currently accounts for only about 0.5% of fertilizer P imports to the EU.
checked
2026-10-06
Struvite recovery from wastewater currently accounts for approximately 0.5% of fertilizer phosphorus imports to the EU.
“Current replacement of fertilizer P imports to the EU by struvite account for 0.5%.”
EU · 2020 · pilot or niche
weak (company, news, market research, other) ✓
www.susfert.eu
Struvite and other bio-based fertilizers showed mean mineral replacement values of 80–125% compared to triple superphosphate in field experiments.
“Ammonium magnesium phosphate (struvite), dicalcium phosphate and phytate-based fertilisers performed best across all field experiments (mean mineral replacement values of 80 – 125 %).”
Europe · 2025 ·
peer-reviewed ✓
exa.ai
Struvite is currently marketed at prices ranging from €0–100 per ton to as high as €1000 per ton, often lower than the estimated market value of its macronutrients.
“Furthermore, our research shows that struvite is currently mainly marketed at values between €0–100 per ton, but also at considerably higher prices of €350 per ton (Phoshorgreen) to €1000 (Pearl) per ton.”
· 2020 ·
weak (company, news, market research, other) ✓
www.susfert.eu
The switch to recovered phosphorus is driven by the need for phosphorus security, circularity, and potential environmental benefits such as reducing cadmium accumulation in soil.
“The manufacturing and use of recycled P products evaluated in this manuscript could partially substitute mineral P fertilisers, offering not only benefits in terms of P security via circularity, but also potential environmental benefits.”
· 2023 ·
weak (company, news, market research, other)
repositum.tuwien.at
Struvite recovery from wastewater currently covers only 0.1% of EU agriculture’s phosphorus demand.
“It covers only 0.1% of EU agriculture’s phosphorus demand (2).”
EU · 2025 · pilot or niche
weak (company, news, market research, other) ✓
fer-play.eu
Struvite production in the European Union in 2020 accounted for 0.5% of the total phosphorus theoretically contained in EU wastewater or 0.06-0.07% of the EU phosphorus imported for fertilizer use in 2017.
“This corresponds to 0.5% of the total P theoretically contained in EU wastewater or 0.06-0.07% of the EU P imported for fertilizer use in 2017 (estimated based on a population of 508 million in EU-28, a discharge of 1.2 g P/person/day and an import of 1.725 million ton P/year (FAO, 2020)).”
EU · 2017-2020 · pilot or niche
peer-reviewed ✓
exa.ai

Details

Replaces (partial): rock-derived P fertilizer share; chemical P precipitation at treatment plants · Scope: municipal and food-industry wastewater · Evidence: medium–high

The chemical problem#

  • Mineral P fertilizer comes from phosphate rock, a finite resource concentrated in a few countries (Morocco/Western Sahara holds most reserves).
  • Sedimentary rock contains cadmium; the EU limits Cd in fertilizer to 60 mg/kg P₂O₅ under the Fertilising Products Regulation.
  • Wastewater plants remove P to protect rivers — often by dosing iron or aluminium salts, which binds the P into a sludge plants cannot use easily.

Product overview#

  1. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) — polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria take up P in the activated-sludge process, replacing metal-salt dosing.
  2. Struvite recovery — in the digester, the P is released again; adding magnesium to the digester liquor precipitates struvite (MgNH₄PO₄·6H₂O) as clean crystals.
  3. Use as fertilizer — granular struvite is a slow-release N-P-Mg fertilizer with very low heavy-metal content.
  4. A side benefit for the plant: controlled struvite precipitation prevents scale that blocks pipes and pumps.

Active ingredient / Composition#

  • Struvite: ~5–6 % N, ~28 % P₂O₅ (in pure form ~29 %), ~16 % MgO.
  • Cd and other metals usually far below rock-derived fertilizers.

Key facts#

ParameterValue
Agronomic efficiencyMeta-analysis: struvite performs similar to soluble mineral P fertilizers on average; slower in alkaline soils
ReleaseLow water solubility, dissolves with root acids → slow release, low leaching
Recovery shareStruvite reactors typically recover a fraction (often 10–40 %) of the plant’s P load; ash-based routes recover more
RegulationEU FPR 2019/1009 component material category CMC 12 (precipitated phosphate salts and derivates)

Advantages#

  • Low cadmium — a clean P source where soil Cd is a concern.
  • Domestic P supply for import-dependent countries.
  • Cuts metal-salt purchases at the treatment plant and reduces pipe scaling.
  • Slow release suits perennial and horticultural crops and lowers P run-off.

Mode of action#

  • EBPR bacteria store P as polyphosphate under alternating anaerobic/aerobic conditions → P is concentrated in biomass instead of precipitated with Fe/Al.
  • In anaerobic digestion the P is released into the liquor; controlled pH and Mg addition crystallize struvite.
  • In soil, struvite dissolves near roots as they release organic acids, supplying P, N and Mg.

Application#

SituationTargetMethod, timing and specifics
Large EBPR plants with digestersP recoveryStruvite reactor on the digester liquor (dewatering filtrate)
Arable crops, neutral/acid soilsP supplyGranular struvite at sowing, blended with soluble P where fast early P is needed
Turf, nurseries, perennialsSlow-release PStruvite granules as a low-leaching P source
Food-industry effluents (dairy, potato)P recoveryOn-site struvite precipitation from high-P streams

Limitations#

  • Recovers only part of the P in wastewater; the rest stays in sludge (see WC03) unless ash-based recovery is added.
  • Slower P release in alkaline soils; combine with soluble P for young crops.
  • Needs a larger plant with digestion — not viable for small works.
  • Public acceptance and fertilizer approval of “sewage-derived” products differ between countries.

Evidence of displacement — D1: works, adoption not proven#

Verified figures (the number is in the quoted sentence and the sentence is on the source page):

  • displacement — Struvite production in the European Union in 2020 accounted for 0.5% of the total phosphorus theoretically contained in EU wastewater or 0.06-0.07% of the EU phosphorus imported for fertilizer use in 2017. (EU, 2017-2020; peer-reviewed: exa.ai)
  • displacement — Struvite recovery from wastewater currently accounts for approximately 0.5% of fertilizer phosphorus imports to the EU. (EU, 2020; weak: susfert.eu)
  • displacement — Struvite recovery from wastewater currently covers only 0.1% of EU agriculture’s phosphorus demand. (EU, 2025; weak: fer-play.eu)
  • performance — Struvite and other bio-based fertilizers showed mean mineral replacement values of 80–125% compared to triple superphosphate in field experiments. (Europe, 2025; peer-reviewed: exa.ai)

Suppliers — real products and services (from the vendor index)#

Honest finding: no company in this index shows struvite or another recovered-phosphate fertilizer product on its own card. The closest cards describe general “nutrient recovery” inside biogas or wastewater systems — e.g. WEC Water (resource beneficiation incl. nutrients and biosolids), SGTech (livestock-waste nutrient recovery) and Spans Envirotech — but none names a recovered-P fertilizer, so none is cited as a supplier.

Update 2026-10-02: the new USA & Canada dataset supplies this product — rows marked NA below. For Africa/ME, LatAm and Asia the regional gap noted above still stands.

Companies below are active vendors in the vendor index whose own card (profile / official website) shows this product or service — matched 2026-10-05 by keyword and checked by hand against the card text. Being listed is not an endorsement; open each card for evidence, contacts and status.

Update 2026-10-05: the new Europe dataset supplies this product — rows marked Europe below. For the other regions the gap noted above still stands unless a row says otherwise.

CompanyRegion · CountryWhat the index showsCard
Ostara Nutrient Recovery TechnologiesNA · CanadaCrystal Green struvite fertilizer lines recovered from wastewatercard
NuReSysEurope · Belgiumstruvite crystallization recovering phosphorus, nitrogen and magnesium from wastewatercard
Struvia (Veolia)Europe · FranceVeolia phosphorus-recovery technology for municipal and industrial wastewatercard
EasyMiningEurope · SwedenAsh2Phos phosphorus recovery from sewage-sludge ash; Aqua2N nitrogen recoverycard

Government funding signals#

Scanned 2026-10-01 (OpenAIRE + NSF); candidates reviewed by hand.

Signal: Moderate. A steady line of public projects, from EU FP7 (230788, struvite precipitation from wastes) to commercialization: NSF I-Corps 2241633 “Struvite Recovery for Organic Food Production” (2022), FCT SFRH/BD/84116/2012 “biological struvite production”, UKRI-EPSRC 2931885 (struvite precipitation and nutrient recovery modelling, 2024) and Academy of Finland 323655 (nutrient recovery from industrial wastewater, €345 k).

Scientific evidence#

  • Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S (2009). The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change 19: 292–305.
  • Talboys PJ, Heppell J, Roose T, et al. (2016). Struvite: a slow-release fertiliser for sustainable phosphorus management? Plant and Soil 401: 109–123.
  • Huygens D, Saveyn HGM (2018). Agronomic efficiency of selected phosphorus fertilisers derived from secondary raw materials for European agriculture. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38: 52.
  • Roberts TL (2014). Cadmium and phosphorous fertilizers: the issues and the science. Procedia Engineering 83: 52–59.

Bioeconomy value#

Biological P removal plus struvite recovery turns a water-protection cost into a clean fertilizer. For phosphate-importing countries it is a small but strategic domestic P source. In this catalogue it is a supplier gap, not a demand gap.

Cross-links: W01 biological treatment; WC03 sewage and faecal sludge; NU03 organic fertilizers.

Technologies