# HTA dossier preparation

Health-economic evidence packages — systematic clinical-evidence reviews, cost-effectiveness and budget-impact modeling, patient-perspective data — that a biopharma manufacturer must assemble to win pricing and reimbursement approval from a national HTA body (NICE, G-BA, CADTH), prepared by specialty consultancies against strict statutory deadlines (56 days for a NICE Single Technology Appraisal), increasingly using AI to compress a traditionally months-long process.

Source: https://en.bioecon.ru/technology/hta-dossier-preparation/
Updated: 2026-08-18



## Overview and value chain

Markers: [EC: EU Joint Clinical Assessment (Regulation (EU) 2021/2282) | OECD: Biotech and health | Regulator: FDA (USA), EMA (EU), NMPA (China)]

HTA dossier preparation assembles the health-economic evidence package a
biopharma manufacturer must submit to a national health technology
assessment body — NICE in the UK, G-BA in Germany, CADTH in Canada — to win
a pricing and reimbursement decision after a drug or device already has
regulatory marketing authorization. A NICE Single Technology Appraisal gives
manufacturers a hard 56-calendar-day deadline to submit a full evidence
dossier once scoping is complete, and Germany's AMNOG dossier for the G-BA
carries similarly compressed timelines. One specialty consultancy has
prepared over 370 HTA submission dossiers, more than 135 to NICE alone;
another has built an in-house AI tool that compressed a full German AMNOG
dossier's production time to three months. This is a distinct advisory
service from the CMC regulatory filing and market-access manufacturing
services already covered on this site — HTA dossier work happens after
regulatory approval, building the separate economic case a payer needs to
agree to reimburse the product, not the safety/efficacy case a regulator
needs to approve it.

Key directions of HTA dossier preparation:
1. **Systematic evidence review (Systematic Evidence Review):** structured
   literature reviews and network meta-analyses building the clinical
   comparator evidence base an HTA submission requires.
2. **Cost-effectiveness and budget-impact modeling (Cost-Effectiveness
   Modeling):** health-economic models calculating a therapy's
   cost-per-outcome and budget impact against national HTA methodology
   standards.
3. **AI-assisted dossier generation (AI-Assisted Dossier Generation):**
   AI tools that convert structured clinical trial data into the narrative
   sections an HTA dossier requires, compressing production timelines.
4. **Payer and HTA stakeholder engagement (Stakeholder Engagement):**
   structured advisory support for the negotiation and scientific-advice
   stages of an HTA submission process.

### Sectoral value chain

```
[regulatory marketing authorization] ──> [evidence synthesis] ──> [economic modeling] ──> [dossier assembly]
                                                                          │
                                                              (HTA body statutory deadline)
                                                                          │
                                                                          ▼
[pricing/reimbursement decision] <─── [HTA body submission] <──┘
```

### Value chain levels

| Level | Description | Key inputs/outputs |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Scoping** | defining the HTA submission's comparator and population scope | **In:** regulatory approval, target HTA body requirements. **Out:** submission scope document. |
| **Evidence synthesis** | systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical data | **In:** clinical trial data, published literature. **Out:** synthesized evidence base. |
| **Economic modeling** | cost-effectiveness and budget-impact model construction | **In:** evidence base, cost data. **Out:** health-economic model outputs. |
| **Dossier assembly** | compiling the full submission document per HTA body format | **In:** evidence, model outputs. **Out:** complete HTA dossier. |
| **Submission & review** | formal submission and response to HTA body evidence requests | **In:** complete dossier. **Out:** HTA body evaluation, clarification responses. |
| **Decision & negotiation** | pricing/reimbursement decision and any negotiated agreement | **In:** HTA evaluation. **Out:** reimbursement decision, price agreement. |

Cross-cutting technologies:
- **AI-assisted dossier generation (AI-Assisted Dossier Generation):**
  software converting structured clinical data into HTA-required narrative
  documentation.
- **Cost-effectiveness modeling (Health-Economic Modeling):** statistical
  and economic models calculating cost-per-outcome against HTA methodology
  standards.
- **AMNOG/NICE submission workflow (Statutory-Deadline Submission
  Workflow):** structured project-management processes built around each
  HTA body's specific statutory submission deadlines.

---

## US

The US HTA landscape is shaped by a non-mandated but increasingly
influential nonprofit assessor, with specialty consultancies built
specifically around navigating its evidence expectations alongside private
payer requirements.

### ICER's non-mandatory but influential role, AI-native and established consultancy models, private-payer evidence requirements
- **Lumanity (Bethesda, founded 2020):** formed through the merger of
  several established health-economics and market-access firms including
  Cello Health and BresMed, with 1,200+ employees across the US, UK, Europe
  and India providing health-economics-and-outcomes-research services.
- **VantEdge Access (Illinois, hubs in Chicago/Oak Brook and Paris):**
  combines AI-enabled HTA intelligence with consulting expertise across the
  US, Canada and EU-5 markets, supporting biopharma teams through
  development, launch and lifecycle market-access strategy.
- **ICER's non-mandatory influence:** unlike NICE or other statutory HTA
  bodies, ICER's cost-effectiveness assessments are not mandated in the US,
  but its value-based price estimates increasingly shape payer
  negotiations and coverage decisions.

---

## CN

No confirmed China-domiciled HTA-specialist consultancy was found operating
independently; international consultancies with China offices serve
manufacturers navigating the National Reimbursement Drug List process
instead.

### NRDL as the reimbursement gateway, international-firm China offices, no confirmed domestic specialist
- **NRDL as the reimbursement gateway:** inclusion on China's National
  Reimbursement Drug List, administered by the National Healthcare
  Security Administration, determines whether a product is reimbursed
  nationally and is often the only path to prescription within public
  hospitals.
- **NHDRC evaluation role:** China's National Health Development Research
  Center provides technical HTA consultancy to health policy-makers, with
  a panel of health-economic experts scoring each eligible drug — a
  government research-institution role rather than a private-vendor
  service.
- **International firms' China presence:** established international HTA
  consultancies maintain Shanghai offices to serve manufacturers navigating
  NRDL submissions, but no independently confirmed China-domiciled
  specialist firm was found — left qualitative pending a real candidate.

---

## EU

Europe hosts the field's most established specialty consultancies, built
around the UK's NICE and Germany's AMNOG processes, both running on strict
statutory deadlines.

### NICE 56-day statutory deadline, AMNOG AI-compressed dossier production, B Corp-certified global consultancy model
- **Costello Medical (Cambridge, UK):** a B Corp-certified consultancy with
  offices spanning Europe, Asia-Pacific and North America, having developed
  over 370 HTA submission dossiers with 135+ submitted to NICE alone, and
  winner of the King's Award for Enterprise in International Trade (2025).
- **Kintiga (UK, ~90 employees):** a pan-European market-access consultancy
  whose in-house AI tool (EPRI) compressed a full German AMNOG HTA
  dossier's production to three months, alongside direct AMNOG negotiation
  support.
- **NICE's 56-day statutory deadline:** manufacturers face a hard
  56-calendar-day deadline to submit a full evidence dossier for a NICE
  Single Technology Appraisal once scoping concludes, the timeline pressure
  driving demand for specialty dossier-preparation services.

---

## Leading companies and research institutes

| Company / Institute | Country | Key products / platforms | Tech features | Status 2026 |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| **Costello Medical** | 🇬🇧 UK | *Full HTA evidence packages (strategy through dossier writing)* | 370+ HTA dossiers delivered, 135+ to NICE; B Corp certified; King's Award for Enterprise 2025 | Commercial |
| **Kintiga** | 🇬🇧 UK | *EPRI AI-assisted AMNOG/NICE/JCA dossier tool* | AI-compressed AMNOG dossier production to 3 months; ~90 employees, 2 continents | Commercial |
| **Lumanity** | 🇺🇸 USA | *HEOR and market-access advisory* | Formed 2020 via Cello Health/BresMed/Guidemark Health merger; 1,200+ employees | Commercial |
| **VantEdge Access** | 🇺🇸 USA | *AI-enabled HTA intelligence platform* | US/Canada/EU-5 coverage; combines AI tooling with senior HEOR consulting | Commercial |

---

## Tech stack and innovations

The category's technical work spans health-economic methodology and,
increasingly, AI tooling that compresses the traditionally document-heavy
dossier-writing process.

1. **Cost-effectiveness modeling infrastructure (Health-Economic Model
   Construction):**
   - Modelers build cost-effectiveness and budget-impact models specific to
     each HTA body's required methodology — NICE's reference-case
     requirements differ from G-BA's AMNOG framework, requiring
     jurisdiction-specific model construction rather than a single reusable
     template.
   - Network meta-analysis techniques let a dossier compare a therapy
     against multiple relevant comparators even when no direct
     head-to-head trial exists.
2. **AI-assisted dossier drafting (Structured-to-Narrative AI
   Conversion):**
   - AI tools convert structured clinical trial data directly into the
     narrative sections an HTA dossier's required format demands,
     compressing a process that traditionally took many months of manual
     medical writing.
   - This is a live technical differentiator: one firm's AI-assisted
     workflow completed a full AMNOG dossier in three months, a
     significantly compressed timeline versus traditional manual
     preparation.
3. **Statutory-deadline project management (Multi-Jurisdiction Submission
   Workflow):**
   - Firms operating across multiple HTA bodies manage genuinely different
     statutory deadlines and evidence-format requirements in parallel — a
     NICE STA's 56-day window differs from AMNOG's own compressed
     timeline — requiring dedicated project infrastructure rather than a
     single generic consulting workflow.

---

## Value chains and production pipelines

### Industrial pipeline of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal dossier

```
┌───────────────────────────┐      ┌───────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Scoping                 │ ───> │ 2. Evidence synthesis     │
└───────────────────────────┘      └───────────────────────────┘
                                                 │
                                                 ▼
┌───────────────────────────┐      ┌───────────────────────────┐
│ 4. Dossier assembly       │ <─── │ 3. Economic modeling      │
└───────────────────────────┘      └───────────────────────────┘
              │
              ▼
┌───────────────────────────┐      ┌───────────────────────────┐
│ 5. Submission             │ ───> │ 6. Decision & negotiation │
└───────────────────────────┘      └───────────────────────────┘
```

#### Stage 1: Scoping
The consultancy and manufacturer agree the submission's target population,
comparator therapies and outcome measures based on the HTA body's published
scoping document.

#### Stage 2: Evidence synthesis
A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis assembles the
clinical evidence base, including indirect comparisons where no direct
head-to-head trial against every relevant comparator exists.

#### Stage 3: Economic modeling
A cost-effectiveness and budget-impact model is built to the specific
methodology the target HTA body requires, calculating cost-per-outcome and
national budget impact.

#### Stage 4: Dossier assembly
Evidence synthesis and modeling outputs are compiled into the complete
dossier document, in the exact format and section structure the HTA body
mandates — increasingly assisted by AI tools that draft narrative sections
from structured data.

#### Stage 5: Submission
The complete dossier is formally submitted within the HTA body's statutory
deadline — 56 calendar days for a NICE STA following scoping — and the
consultancy manages responses to any evidence clarification requests.

#### Stage 6: Decision and negotiation
The HTA body issues its pricing/reimbursement evaluation, with the
consultancy supporting the manufacturer through any negotiation or appeal
stage before a final reimbursement decision and price agreement.

